<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash Websites &#8211; Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alpha-lite.co.uk/webdev/flash-websites-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alpha-lite.co.uk/webdev/flash-websites-why/</link>
	<description>Jamie Oliver&#039;s corner of the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olu</title>
		<link>http://blog.alpha-lite.co.uk/webdev/flash-websites-why/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>olu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alpha-lite.co.uk/?p=264#comment-131</guid>
		<description>You are right about flash and all its flaws. Flash is capable of producing some pretty good looking sites, maybe that&#039;s why people choose to use it against the odds. Some of the best looking sites I have ever seen where in flash equipped with action script. Its really hard to say no to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right about flash and all its flaws. Flash is capable of producing some pretty good looking sites, maybe that&#8217;s why people choose to use it against the odds. Some of the best looking sites I have ever seen where in flash equipped with action script. Its really hard to say no to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

